Peer Instruction Vote Shift

Compare peer-instruction concept votes before and after discussion.

Description

Before-and-after concept votes compare aggregate correctness around peer discussion.

Before-and-after concept votes compare aggregate correctness around peer discussion. Percentage-point change describes the difference on one cohort denominator.1

Compare peer-instruction concept votes before and after discussion.

When to use Peer Instruction Vote Shift

Use this tool to compare peer-instruction concept votes before and after discussion.

Prepare the lesson timeline, roster, observations or assessment labels requested. Use consistent units and exact identifiers, then choose comparison criteria appropriate to the activity.

How to use Peer Instruction Vote Shift and understand its results

  1. Prepare the lesson timeline, roster, observations or assessment labels requested. Use consistent units and exact identifiers, then choose comparison criteria appropriate to the activity.
  2. Enter initialCorrect, postDiscussionCorrect, participants using the field table and calculation rules, then run the tool.
  3. Read initialPercent, postPercent, percentagePointGain. The explanation below defines the units, signs, ordering and any flags or placeholder values.
  4. If the tool reports an input issue, correct the values and run it again. Apply the stated assumptions when interpreting a successfully returned result.
Input fieldMeaningValue type; see rules belowRequirement
initialCorrectInitial correctnumberRequired
postDiscussionCorrectPost discussion correctnumberRequired
participantsParticipantsnumberRequired

Enter positive safe-integer participants and integer correct counts within that total. Return initial/post percentages and signed percentage-point change.

gainPoints=100(postCorrect−initialCorrect)/participants

Units, indexing, boundary conditions and exceptional cases are defined in the calculation rules above.

Output fieldMeaningValue type
initialPercentInitial percentnumber
postPercentPost percentnumber
percentagePointGainPercentage point gainnumber
json
{
  "input": {
    "initialCorrect": 12,
    "postDiscussionCorrect": 18,
    "participants": 20
  },
  "output": {
    "initialPercent": 60,
    "postPercent": 90,
    "percentagePointGain": 30
  }
}

Limitations and assumptions

No individual vote transitions, attendance changes or causal learning effect are inferred. A negative change is a valid outcome.

Numeric inputs must be finite. Follow the calculation-specific rules for overflow, underflow and exceptional cases. Missing required fields, extra fields, wrong value types and violations of the calculation rules are input errors.

Alternative or Complementary methods

Use Think Pair Share Timeline: Schedule think, pair, and share phases with pair count. For a complementary task, use Desirable Difficulty Calibration: Calibrate practice difficulty from observed recall and caller target band.

References

  1. Peer Instruction Vote Shift — tool.io

Similar or alternative tools

Don't forget to set a bookmark for tool.io!
Privacy | Imprint | Cookies