Expunging Blackout Rater
Rate how heavily an entry was expunged under the stated rule: share of lines blacked out banded as untouched (0%), spot (<10%), partial (10-50%) or wholesale (>50%), with fullyBlackedOut set when every line is struck or the observer declares whole-entry erasure.
Description
Rate how heavily an entry was expunged under the stated rule: share of lines blacked out banded as untouched (0%), spot (<10%), partial (10-50%) or wholesale (>50%), with fullyBlackedOut set when every line is struck or the observer declares whole-entry erasure.
Expunging Blackout Rater: Rate how heavily an entry was expunged under the stated rule: share of lines blacked out banded as untouched (0%), spot (<10%), partial (10-50%) or wholesale (>50%), with fullyBlackedOut set when every line is struck or the observer declares whole-entry erasure.
When to use Expunging Blackout Rater
Use this palaeographic utility to apply a stated dating, script, abbreviation, codicological, metrological, layout, or condition rule consistently while preparing manuscripts for scholarly review.
- Total lines
- Lines in the affected entry or record.
- Expunged lines
- Lines obscured by expunging strokes.
- Whole entry expunged
- True when the observer records the whole entry as blacked out.
How Expunging Blackout Rater works
Rate how heavily an entry was expunged under the stated rule: share of lines blacked out banded as untouched (0%), spot (<10%), partial (10-50%) or wholesale (>50%), with fullyBlackedOut set when every line is struck or the observer declares whole-entry erasure. The tool evaluates the supplied inputs together and returns the named outputs below; it does not infer omitted operating conditions or change the units shown.1
- Expunged %
- Expunged lines as a percentage of all lines.
- Severity band
- Severity band from the stated thresholds.
- Fully blacked out
- True when nothing legible remains by count or declaration.
Limitations and assumptions
- Script and manuscript evidence varies by language, region, institution, period, scribe, material, restoration, and cataloguing convention. A heuristic flag or score is not an authoritative date, hand attribution, reading, provenance, or conservation diagnosis.
- Use finite inputs in the displayed units and preserve more precision than the final presentation requires. Independently verify safety-critical, financial, compliance, or production decisions.
Alternative or Complementary approaches
Retain page images, scale, foliation, material, provenance, diplomatic transcription, uncertainty, and comparison exemplars; confirm conclusions with codicological context and specialist judgment.
References
-
Conservation and restoration of manuscripts — Wikipedia contributors
Similar or alternative tools
- Iron-Gall Corrosion Grade Rater
Rate iron-gall ink corrosion on the stated transparent rule: each of four indicators (ink loss, burn-through, halo bleeding, mechanical weakness of the sheet) is scored 0-3 by the observer, and the grade is the rounded mean with labels none/slight/moderate/severe for 0/1/2/3.
- Ductus Complexity Index Rater
Rate script ductus complexity under the stated rule: strokes per letter with bands economical (<3), moderate (3-6) and complex (>6), plus pen lifts per letter as a secondary index.
- Nib / X-height Consistency Checker
Check that repeated x-height measurements agree within tolerance under the stated rule: spread is (max-min)/mean in percent and the hand counts as consistent when spread does not exceed the tolerance (default 10%).