Iron-Gall Corrosion Grade Rater
Rate iron-gall ink corrosion on the stated transparent rule: each of four indicators (ink loss, burn-through, halo bleeding, mechanical weakness of the sheet) is scored 0-3 by the observer, and the grade is the rounded mean with labels none/slight/moderate/severe for 0/1/2/3.
Description
Rate iron-gall ink corrosion on the stated transparent rule: each of four indicators (ink loss, burn-through, halo bleeding, mechanical weakness of the sheet) is scored 0-3 by the observer, and the grade is the rounded mean with labels none/slight/moderate/severe for 0/1/2/3.
Iron-Gall Corrosion Grade Rater: Rate iron-gall ink corrosion on the stated transparent rule: each of four indicators (ink loss, burn-through, halo bleeding, mechanical weakness of the sheet) is scored 0-3 by the observer, and the grade is the rounded mean with labels none/slight/moderate/severe for 0/1/2/3.
When to use Iron-Gall Corrosion Grade Rater
Use this palaeographic utility to apply a stated dating, script, abbreviation, codicological, metrological, layout, or condition rule consistently while preparing manuscripts for scholarly review.
- Ink loss
- Ink loss or flaking severity, 0-3.
- Burn-through
- Burn-through of the support, 0-3.
- Halo bleeding
- Brown halo bleeding around strokes, 0-3.
- Sheet weakness
- Mechanical weakness (cracking, tearing) of the sheet, 0-3.
How Iron-Gall Corrosion Grade Rater works
Rate iron-gall ink corrosion on the stated transparent rule: each of four indicators (ink loss, burn-through, halo bleeding, mechanical weakness of the sheet) is scored 0-3 by the observer, and the grade is the rounded mean with labels none/slight/moderate/severe for 0/1/2/3. The tool evaluates the supplied inputs together and returns the named outputs below; it does not infer omitted operating conditions or change the units shown.1
- Mean score
- Unrounded mean of the four indicator scores.
- Corrosion grade
- Corrosion grade: rounded mean score on the 0-3 scale.
- Grade label
- Label for the grade band.
Limitations and assumptions
- Script and manuscript evidence varies by language, region, institution, period, scribe, material, restoration, and cataloguing convention. A heuristic flag or score is not an authoritative date, hand attribution, reading, provenance, or conservation diagnosis.
- Use finite inputs in the displayed units and preserve more precision than the final presentation requires. Independently verify safety-critical, financial, compliance, or production decisions.
Alternative or Complementary approaches
Retain page images, scale, foliation, material, provenance, diplomatic transcription, uncertainty, and comparison exemplars; confirm conclusions with codicological context and specialist judgment.
References
-
Conservation and restoration of manuscripts — Wikipedia contributors
Similar or alternative tools
- Carbon / Iron-Gall Note Generator
Generate a condition-note verdict for carbon versus iron-gall ink under the stated counting rule: three documented carbon traits (opaque black core, black in reflectography, water-smudge resistant) are counted against three documented iron-gall traits (brown edge tinge, halo bleeding, corrosion holes), and the majority side wins while a tie yields 'mixed indications'.
- Expunging Blackout Rater
Rate how heavily an entry was expunged under the stated rule: share of lines blacked out banded as untouched (0%), spot (<10%), partial (10-50%) or wholesale (>50%), with fullyBlackedOut set when every line is struck or the observer declares whole-entry erasure.
- Margin Proportion Rater
Rate measured margins against the classic codicological rule of thumb (outer about twice the inner, bottom about twice the top) with exact ratios and a stated default tolerance of 0.25 on each ratio.