Skip to content

Main content

Forced Choice Guessing Rate Reference Tool

Return the uniform guessing probability for one correct option among an explicit positive forced-choice option count.

Loading tool…

Description

Calculate the probability of a correct uniform guess among supplied choices.

Experimental-psychology records separate condition labels, declared masking, timing assumptions, response rules and reward realizations. A supplied random draw can be evaluated without generating randomness, and a threshold comparison does not verify preregistration or establish statistical significance. Experimental validity needs the complete design and source observations.

Calculate the probability of a correct uniform guess among supplied choices.

When to use this tool

Use Forced Choice Guessing Rate Reference when checking the stated benign experiment record, timing, allocation or payoff convention.

How to use the tool and how it works

  1. Enter choiceCount. Use the units and conventions below.
  2. Run the tool. Correct any format, range, or cross-field input error before interpreting the output.
  3. Read uniformGuessProbability. Use the output convention below.

Require whole choiceCount>=1. Return 1/choiceCount as uniformGuessProbability.1

Input fieldMeaning and unitsAccepted input
choiceCountChoice CountRequired. Safe integer; minimum 1.
Output fieldInterpretationReturned shape
uniformGuessProbabilityUniform Guess ProbabilityRequired. Finite number.
json
{
  "input": {
    "choiceCount": 4
  },
  "output": {
    "uniformGuessProbability": 0.25
  }
}

Limitations and assumptions

  • Assumes equally likely independent action choices for this one response; actual guessing, response bias and task performance are not estimated.
  • Inputs must satisfy both the field types and the cross-field conditions above. Invalid input causes an error; a successful false flag or documented placeholder is a different result.
  • Numeric calculations use binary floating point unless exact decimal-integer arithmetic is explicitly stated. No hidden measurement tolerance or decimal rounding is added; nonfinite or out-of-contract results are rejected. Numeric signed-zero results are exported as zero.

Alternative or Complementary methods

Use verified protocols, calibrated timing, appropriate complete statistical methods and responsible participant/ethics review for actual experimental conclusions.

References

  1. Calculation and input contract: experimental-psychology/forced-choice-guessing-rate-reference — tool.io

Similar or alternative tools