Description
Record a decision-consent revocation status as a supplied label.
Ethics records describe supplied claims, roles, obligations, consent status and participation counts. Recording a permission modality or competing role does not resolve a duty conflict, establish valid consent or determine an ethically acceptable decision. Numerical balance and equal turn counts are limited summaries.
Record a decision-consent revocation status as a supplied label.
When to use this tool
Use Decision Consent Revocation Status Label when checking the stated ethical-review record, obligation or participation convention.
How to use the tool and how it works
- Enter recordId, recordedStatus. Use the units and conventions below.
- Run the tool. Correct any format, range, or cross-field input error before interpreting the output.
- Read label. Use the output convention below.
Require nonempty recordId and status active, revoked, partially-revoked or unknown. Format recordId [status].1
| Input field | Meaning and units | Accepted input |
|---|---|---|
| recordId | Nonempty caller-supplied record label; not independently resolved. | Required. Text; minimum UTF-16 length 1; maximum UTF-16 length 8192. |
| recordedStatus | Recorded Status | Required. Text; one of "active", "revoked", "partially-revoked", "unknown"; maximum UTF-16 length 8192. |
| Output field | Interpretation | Returned shape |
|---|---|---|
| label | Formatted supplied record wording; no independent validation of its substantive meaning. | Required. Text; maximum UTF-16 length 8192. |
{
"input": {
"recordId": "R17",
"recordedStatus": "revoked"
},
"output": {
"label": "R17 [revoked]"
}
}Limitations and assumptions
- Status is declared, not verified; scope, valid consent, revocation authority and legal processing rights are not determined.
- Inputs must satisfy both the field types and the cross-field conditions above. Invalid input causes an error; a successful false flag or documented placeholder is a different result.
Alternative or Complementary methods
Review the original evidence, affected people’s interests and applicable professional/governance requirements with the responsible ethics team for substantive decisions.
References
Similar or alternative tools
- Argument Premise Implicitness Marker
Label whether a stated argument premise is explicit or implicit.
- Duty Conflict Joint Role Token
Record a pair of roles associated with a stated duty conflict.