Description
Locate literal negation-marker tokens under a case policy.
Scholarly annotation can preserve term senses, agent roles and source frames using explicit labels. Literal agreement, a recognized marker or an unambiguous record key organizes those assertions without establishing their meaning, truth or scholarly authority.
Locate literal negation-marker tokens under a case policy.
When to use this tool
Use Claim Negation Marker Count when checking one explicit annotation, marker or source-identity convention.
How to use the tool and how it works
- Enter tokens, suppliedMarkers, caseSensitive. Keep parallel arrays aligned. Use the units and conventions below.
- Run the tool. Correct any format, range, or cross-field input error before interpreting the output.
- Read count, positions. Use the output convention below.
Locate literal negation-marker tokens under a case policy. Optionally lowercase tokens and suppliedMarkers, deduplicate the marker vocabulary and return matching zero-based positions and count.1
| Input field | Meaning and units | Accepted input |
|---|---|---|
| tokens | Tokens | Required. Array of text; maximum UTF-16 length 8192; maximum items 256. |
| suppliedMarkers | Supplied Markers | Required. Array of text; maximum UTF-16 length 8192; maximum items 256. |
| caseSensitive | Case Sensitive | Required. Boolean. |
| Output field | Interpretation | Returned shape |
|---|---|---|
| count | Count | Required. Safe integer. |
| positions | Positions | Required. Array of safe integer; maximum items 256. |
{
"input": {
"tokens": [
"NOT",
"a",
"never"
],
"suppliedMarkers": [
"not",
"never"
],
"caseSensitive": false
},
"output": {
"count": 2,
"positions": [
0,
2
]
}
}Limitations and assumptions
- Tokenization and marker vocabulary are supplied; matches do not determine linguistic negation scope or claim truth.
- Inputs must satisfy both the field types and the cross-field conditions above. Invalid input causes an error; a successful false flag or documented placeholder is a different result.
Alternative or Complementary methods
Inspect the source text and interpretive framework for substantive analysis; use source-aware annotation and bibliographic tools for complete records.
References
Similar or alternative tools
- Agent Action Annotation Count
Count actions recorded for one literal agent label.
- Quotation Voice Distance Marker
Compare quotation voice labels and recognize a supplied distance marker.