Description
Count actions recorded for one literal agent label.
Scholarly annotation can preserve term senses, agent roles and source frames using explicit labels. Literal agreement, a recognized marker or an unambiguous record key organizes those assertions without establishing their meaning, truth or scholarly authority.
Count actions recorded for one literal agent label.
When to use this tool
Use Agent Action Annotation Count when checking one explicit annotation, marker or source-identity convention.
How to use the tool and how it works
- Enter agents, actions, requestedAgent. Keep parallel arrays aligned. Use the units and conventions below.
- Run the tool. Correct any format, range, or cross-field input error before interpreting the output.
- Read count, distinctActions. Use the output convention below.
Count actions recorded for one literal agent label. Require aligned agents/actions; count requestedAgent records and distinct matching action labels.1
| Input field | Meaning and units | Accepted input |
|---|---|---|
| agents | Agents | Required. Array of text; maximum UTF-16 length 8192; maximum items 256. |
| actions | Actions | Required. Array of text; maximum UTF-16 length 8192; maximum items 256. |
| requestedAgent | Requested Agent | Required. Text; maximum UTF-16 length 8192. |
| Output field | Interpretation | Returned shape |
|---|---|---|
| count | Count | Required. Safe integer. |
| distinctActions | Distinct Actions | Required. Safe integer. |
{
"input": {
"agents": [
"A",
"B",
"A"
],
"actions": [
"speak",
"read",
"speak"
],
"requestedAgent": "A"
},
"output": {
"count": 2,
"distinctActions": 1
}
} Limitations and assumptions
- Duplicates increase the record count while distinctActions deduplicates; no entity resolution or action interpretation occurs.
- Inputs must satisfy both the field types and the cross-field conditions above. Invalid input causes an error; a successful false flag or documented placeholder is a different result.
Alternative or Complementary methods
Inspect the source text and interpretive framework for substantive analysis; use source-aware annotation and bibliographic tools for complete records.
References
Similar or alternative tools
- Annotated Agent Role Ambiguity
Detect multiple recognized roles for an annotated agent.
- Claim Negation Marker Count
Locate literal negation-marker tokens under a case policy.