Ames Revertant Background Screen

Screen replicate Ames revertant counts against background with an explicit viability criterion; not a definitive mutagenicity determination.

Description

An Ames count screen compares treated revertants with background while preserving a viability gate.

An Ames count screen compares treated revertants with background while preserving a viability gate. A large count increase without adequate viability evidence is not automatically a valid positive screen.1

Screen replicate Ames revertant counts against background with an explicit viability criterion; not a definitive mutagenicity determination.

When to use Ames Revertant Background Screen

Use this tool to screen replicate Ames revertant counts against background with an explicit viability criterion; not a definitive mutagenicity determination.

Prepare the sample, count, growth or assay measurements requested by this tool. Confirm units, sampling periods and reporting bases; supply independently established comparison criteria where requested.

How to use Ames Revertant Background Screen and understand its results

  1. Prepare the sample, count, growth or assay measurements requested by this tool. Confirm units, sampling periods and reporting bases; supply independently established comparison criteria where requested.
  2. Enter treatedRevertantCounts, controlRevertantCounts, minimumFoldIncrease, treatedViabilityFraction, minimumValidViability using the field table and calculation rules, then run the tool.
  3. Read meanTreatedRevertants, meanControlRevertants, backgroundFoldIncrease, assayViabilityAdequate, screenFlag. The explanation below defines the units, signs, ordering and any flags or placeholder values.
  4. If the tool reports an input issue, correct the values and run it again. Apply the stated assumptions when interpreting a successfully returned result.
Input fieldMeaningValue type; see rules belowRequirement
treatedRevertantCountsTreated revertant countslist of numberRequired
controlRevertantCountsControl revertant countslist of numberRequired
minimumFoldIncreaseMinimum fold increasenumberRequired
treatedViabilityFractionTreated viability fractionnumber; minimum: 0; maximum: 1Required
minimumValidViabilityMinimum valid viabilitynumber; minimum: 0; maximum: 1Required

Enter nonempty replicate lists of nonnegative integer treated/control counts with positive control mean, a positive fold threshold and viability fractions in [0,1]. The tool returns both means, their ratio, an inclusive viability flag and an inclusive fold screen gated by viability. Replicate lists need not be the same length.

foldIncrease=meanTreated/meanControl; flag=viabilityAdequate AND foldIncrease≥minimumFold

Units, indexing, boundary conditions and exceptional cases are defined in the calculation rules above.

Output fieldMeaningValue type
meanTreatedRevertantsMean treated revertantsnumber
meanControlRevertantsMean control revertantsnumber
backgroundFoldIncreaseBackground fold increasenumber
assayViabilityAdequateAssay viability adequateboolean
screenFlagScreen flagboolean
json
{
  "input": {
    "treatedRevertantCounts": [
      30,
      40
    ],
    "controlRevertantCounts": [
      10,
      10
    ],
    "minimumFoldIncrease": 2,
    "treatedViabilityFraction": 0.9,
    "minimumValidViability": 0.8
  },
  "output": {
    "meanTreatedRevertants": 35,
    "meanControlRevertants": 10,
    "backgroundFoldIncrease": 3.5,
    "assayViabilityAdequate": true,
    "screenFlag": true
  }
}

Limitations and assumptions

This does not establish definitive mutagenicity, statistical significance or a dose-response pattern. Strain, controls, metabolic activation and assay design are not assessed by the count ratio.

Numeric inputs must be finite. Follow the calculation-specific rules for overflow, underflow and exceptional cases. Lists are limited to 100,000 entries; the rules above may require smaller limits. Missing required fields, extra fields, wrong value types and violations of the calculation rules are input errors. A successfully returned false flag is an evaluated outcome; its meaning is explained above.

Alternative or Complementary methods

Use Fluctuation Culture Zero Class: Summarize fluctuation-test culture dispersion and the p0 mutation-event estimate from independent culture counts; not mutation frequency per cell. For a complementary task, use Viable Nonculturable Discordance: Screen discordance between viability assay and matched culturability; this pattern alone does not prove a VBNC state.

References

  1. Ames Revertant Background Screen — tool.io

Similar or alternative tools

  • Fluctuation Culture Zero Class

    Summarize fluctuation-test culture dispersion and the p0 mutation-event estimate from independent culture counts; not mutation frequency per cell.

  • Viable Nonculturable Discordance

    Screen discordance between viability assay and matched culturability; this pattern alone does not prove a VBNC state.

Don't forget to set a bookmark for tool.io!
Privacy | Imprint | Cookies