Description
Encode an explicit peer-feedback request format and recipient.
Adult-learning records distinguish self ratings, comparison criteria, acknowledgments, feedback states and recognized credits. Closing a feedback item can mean completion or decline, while a reported rating gap does not establish competence. Supplied priorities and evidence references need the broader learning context.
Encode an explicit peer-feedback request format and recipient.
When to use this tool
Use Peer Feedback Requested Format Token when you already have requestId, requestedFormat, recipientId and need to encode an explicit peer-feedback request format and recipient.
How to use the tool and how it works
- Enter requestId, requestedFormat, recipientId. Use the units and conventions below.
- Run the tool. Correct any format, range, or cross-field input error before interpreting the output.
- Read token. Use the output convention below.
Enter requestId, requestedFormat, recipientId using the field constraints below. Encode these values, in exactly that order, as a JSON array and return the serialized array as text in token. String values are preserved without trimming or external terminology lookup.1
| Input field | Meaning and units | Accepted input |
|---|---|---|
| requestId | Request Id | Required. Text; minimum UTF-16 length 1; maximum UTF-16 length 8192. |
| requestedFormat | Requested Format | Required. Text; minimum UTF-16 length 1; maximum UTF-16 length 8192. |
| recipientId | Recipient Id | Required. Text; minimum UTF-16 length 1; maximum UTF-16 length 8192. |
| Output field | Interpretation | Returned shape |
|---|---|---|
| token | Token | Required. Text; maximum UTF-16 length 8192. |
{
"input": {
"requestId": "R17",
"requestedFormat": "written",
"recipientId": "L4"
},
"output": {
"token": "[\"R17\",\"written\",\"L4\"]"
}
}Limitations and assumptions
- The result records supplied values without selecting accessibility preferences. Sources and asserted relationships are not independently authenticated.
- Inputs must satisfy both the field types and the cross-field conditions above. Invalid input causes an error; a successful false flag or documented placeholder is a different result.
Alternative or Complementary methods
Review the complete goals, criteria, learner preferences, evidence and recognition policy. Use an appropriate educational assessment for learning decisions; local labels, time gaps and supplied credit balances do not establish outcomes or informed agreement.
References
Similar or alternative tools
- Prior Experience Relevance Code
Record a supplied prior-experience relevance code for an explicit learning goal.
- Experiential Learning Reflection Prompt ID
Associate supplied experiential-learning activity, reflection prompt and response identifiers.