Description
Calculate a supplied learning-goal priority share.
Adult-learning records distinguish self ratings, comparison criteria, acknowledgments, feedback states and recognized credits. Closing a feedback item can mean completion or decline, while a reported rating gap does not establish competence. Supplied priorities and evidence references need the broader learning context.
Calculate a supplied learning-goal priority share.
When to use this tool
Use Learner Goal Priority Share when you already have goalPriorityWeight, totalPriorityWeight and need to calculate a supplied learning-goal priority share.
How to use the tool and how it works
- Enter goalPriorityWeight, totalPriorityWeight. Use the units and conventions below.
- Run the tool. Correct any format, range, or cross-field input error before interpreting the output.
- Read priorityShare. Use the output convention below.
Require totalPriorityWeight>0 and goalPriorityWeight within [0,total]; divide goal by total.1
| Input field | Meaning and units | Accepted input |
|---|---|---|
| goalPriorityWeight | Goal Priority Weight | Required. Finite number; minimum 0. |
| totalPriorityWeight | Total Priority Weight | Required. Finite number; strictly above 0. |
| Output field | Interpretation | Returned shape |
|---|---|---|
| priorityShare | Priority Share | Required. Finite number. |
{
"input": {
"goalPriorityWeight": 3,
"totalPriorityWeight": 12
},
"output": {
"priorityShare": 0.25
}
}Limitations and assumptions
- Weights are supplied. This does not infer priorities, evaluate learning needs or ensure all goal weights sum to the stated total.
- Inputs must satisfy both the field types and the cross-field conditions above. Invalid input causes an error; a successful false flag or documented placeholder is a different result.
- Numeric calculations use binary floating point unless exact decimal-integer arithmetic is explicitly stated. No hidden measurement tolerance or decimal rounding is added; nonfinite or out-of-contract results are rejected. Numeric signed-zero results are exported as zero.
Alternative or Complementary methods
Review the complete goals, criteria, learner preferences, evidence and recognition policy. Use an appropriate educational assessment for learning decisions; local labels, time gaps and supplied credit balances do not establish outcomes or informed agreement.
References
Similar or alternative tools
- Problem Case Relevance Rating Pair
Compare supplied personal and work relevance ratings.
- Adult Learning Choice Count
Filter supplied learning-option codes by availability flags.