Dunbar Layer Size Lookup
Bounded offline reference: Dunbar-associated social-network layers are often described near5,15,50,150with larger layers, as approximate research patterns. Source: Dunbar, social brain/social network layer research. Not a universal personal capacity or required relationship quota. Only explicit topic keys supported: inner, sympathy, affinity, active, limitations. No complete external corpus, live data or personal assessment implied.
Description
Dunbar layer references describe approximate nested social-network sizes under particular measurement conventions.
Dunbar layer references describe approximate nested social-network sizes under particular measurement conventions.1
They do not establish a fixed social capacity for every individual.
When to use Dunbar Layer Size Lookup
Use this tool to read a bounded explanation for an exact reference topic. Establish the population, period, variable definitions, sample coverage and independently applicable instrument or calibration.
How to use Dunbar Layer Size Lookup and understand its results
- Establish the population, period, variable definitions, sample coverage and independently applicable instrument or calibration.
- Enter topic, using the field meanings and rules below, then run the tool.
- Read result.text for the exact topic token. Consult the limitations entry where available before applying the reference to your actual context.
- Correct any reported input issue and run again. Before using a successful result, check the stated units, signs, reference scope and observation coverage.
| Input field | Meaning | Value type | Requirement |
|---|---|---|---|
| topic | Topic | string | Required |
Choose one exact topic token from the table. The implementation looks up the stored value and returns it in the documented output field. Matching is case-sensitive; unrecognized tokens fail. This is an offline bounded reference, not a live catalogue or independent attribution.
| Topic token | Stored value |
|---|---|
| inner | An approximate5-person close/support layer is commonly discussed. |
| sympathy | An approximate15-person sympathy layer is commonly discussed. |
| affinity | An approximate50-person affinity layer is commonly discussed. |
| active | An approximate150-person active network is commonly discussed. |
| limitations | Layer boundaries, measurement and population vary; do not diagnose social ability from counts. |
value=referenceTable[exactToken] Use the matching field units and the exact boundary, ordering and reference rules above.
| Output field | Meaning | Value type |
|---|---|---|
| result | Calculated observation or qualified reference | object |
| result.text | Stored explanation for the exact selected reference token. | string |
{
"input": {
"topic": "inner"
},
"output": {
"result": {
"text": "An approximate5-person close/support layer is commonly discussed."
}
}
} Limitations and assumptions
Population definitions, survey design, calibration and observation coverage are independently established. A result describes the supplied record or conditional model without demonstrating causation, validating an instrument or supplying representative population evidence. Layer boundaries, measurement and population vary; do not diagnose social ability from counts.
Missing required fields, unknown fields, wrong types and violated rules return input issues. Numeric values and outputs must be finite. Extremely large composite outputs are rejected.
Alternative or Complementary methods
For a related step, use Political Discussion Network Size Calculator: A discussion-network size counts distinct observed partners of a declared ego. For a complementary comparison, use Weak-Tie Strength Four-Point Scale Tool: Weak-tie strength requires declared observations and an operational definition of tie dimensions.
References
-
Dunbar Layer Size Lookup — tool.io
Similar or alternative tools
- Political Discussion Network Size Calculator
A discussion-network size counts distinct observed partners of a declared ego.
- Weak-Tie Strength Four-Point Scale Tool
Weak-tie strength requires declared observations and an operational definition of tie dimensions.