Skip to content

Main content

Joint Assessment Unable Versus Missing Token Tool

Count explicit assessed, unable and missing site statuses.

Loading tool…

Description

Count explicit assessed, unable and missing site statuses.

Research records distinguish observed, missing, inapplicable, and unverified entries. Those categories affect which denominator or weight a summary uses. A completeness or timing calculation describes the supplied records without assigning a clinical score or interpreting a condition.

Count explicit assessed, unable and missing site statuses.

When to use this tool

Use it for joint assessment unable versus missing token when the required inputs and conventions are already available.

How to use the tool and how it works

  1. Enter statuses. Keep parallel arrays aligned and use the stated units and conventions.
  2. Run the calculation. Correct any input error before interpreting a result.
  3. Read assessed, unable, missing. Inspect any known, defined, inclusion, or boundary flags before interpreting numeric values.

Count exact assessed, unable, and missing status tokens and reject any other token.1

Input fieldMeaning and unitsAccepted input
statusesStatusesRequired. Array of Text; maximum UTF-16 length 8192.; maximum items 256.
Output fieldInterpretationReturned shape
assessedAssessedRequired. Safe integer.
unableUnableRequired. Safe integer.
missingMissingRequired. Safe integer.
json
{
  "input": {
    "statuses": [
      "assessed",
      "unable",
      "missing",
      "assessed"
    ]
  },
  "output": {
    "assessed": 2,
    "unable": 1,
    "missing": 1
  }
}

Limitations and assumptions

  • An empty list returns three zeros. The tool preserves the supplied distinction but does not determine why a site was unassessed or infer a clinical condition.
  • The field tables describe structural bounds; the mechanics also state cross-field requirements. Malformed input shapes, disallowed keys, and invalid domains cause input errors. Results must remain finite and within the declared output contract. A successful false flag or zero placeholder is distinct from an error.
  • Numeric arithmetic uses binary floating point. Exact comparisons have no hidden tolerance or decimal rounding; negative zero is exported as zero. Decimal-text integer operations retain the exactness specifically stated above.

Alternative or Complementary methods

For joint assessment unable versus missing token, check the source records and the supplied rule before comparing the result with another method. Use an appropriately validated measurement or analysis method for clinical interpretation.

References

  1. Calculation and input contract: rheumatology/joint-assessment-unable-versus-missing-token — tool.io

Similar or alternative tools