Syllepsis Grammatical Mismatch Subtype Checker
Audit independently annotated construction evidence for Syllepsis Grammatical Mismatch Subtype Checker. Feature columns, independently annotated in order: single governing expression, independent agreement mismatch, contextual yoking. Unknown evidence and compatible classes retained; not automated semantic, historical, identity, legal or safety determination.
Description
Syllepsis can involve one governing expression whose linked applications create an agreement mismatch.
Syllepsis can involve one governing expression whose linked applications create an agreement mismatch.1
This candidate check requires independently established grammatical and contextual annotations.
When to use Syllepsis Grammatical Mismatch Subtype Checker
Use this tool when you need to audit explicit construction annotations while keeping unknown features visible. Establish the language, clause boundaries, transcription basis, source context, or evidence annotations required by this particular tool.
How to use Syllepsis Grammatical Mismatch Subtype Checker and understand its results
- Establish the language, clause boundaries, transcription basis, source context, or evidence annotations required by this particular tool.
- Enter observedFeatureFlags, featureKnownFlags, following the field table and calculation rules below, then run the tool.
- Read result. Inspect the nested fields in the output table below and keep any missing evidence or selected indices visible.
- Correct any input issues and run again. Before using a successful result, review its units, signs, evidence coverage, and stated model or reference assumptions.
| Input field | Meaning | Value type | Requirement |
|---|---|---|---|
| observedFeatureFlags | Binary presence/absence annotations in the fixed feature-column order | list of number | Required |
| featureKnownFlags | Binary evidence-known flags; zero leaves that feature unknown | list of number | Required |
Enter aligned binary observedFeatureFlags and featureKnownFlags in the exact fixed column order below. For each class, compare known features with its fixed rule: one requires presence, zero requires absence, and minus one ignores the column. A known mismatch excludes the class; an unknown required feature leaves it compatible but unwitnessed. Return all compatible classes, fully witnessed classes, and zero-based unknown-feature indices. A fully witnessed candidate satisfies only these annotations, not a broader semantic or intent test.
compatible_c=∀j(rule_cj=−1 or known_j=0 or feature_j=rule_cj); witnessed_c=∀j(rule_cj=−1 or (known_j=1 and feature_j=rule_cj)) Read these symbols with the field meanings and branch or reference rules above.
Fixed feature column order: single governing expression, independent agreement mismatch, contextual yoking.
| Candidate label | Fixed feature rule |
|---|---|
| syllepsis-candidate | [1,1,1] |
| Output field | Meaning | Value type |
|---|---|---|
| result | Object containing the fields below | object |
| result.compatibleClasses | Candidates with no known feature contradiction; missing evidence may remain | list |
| result.witnessedClasses | Candidates with every required feature known and satisfied | list |
| result.unknownFeatureIndices | Zero-based feature columns whose known flag is zero | list |
{
"input": {
"observedFeatureFlags": [
1,
1,
1
],
"featureKnownFlags": [
1,
1,
1
]
},
"output": {
"result": {
"compatibleClasses": [
"syllepsis-candidate"
],
"witnessedClasses": [
"syllepsis-candidate"
],
"unknownFeatureIndices": []
}
}
}Limitations and assumptions
Annotations and their interpretation must be established independently. Multiple candidates may remain, including candidates with missing evidence. This does not parse raw language, identify intention, prove argument soundness, or infer a rhetorical effect.
Missing required fields, unknown fields, wrong types, and violated calculation rules return input issues. Numeric values must be finite; nonfinite numeric outputs are rejected. Arrays must be dense, with no missing cells. Numeric lists allow at most 10000 entries, subject to smaller tool-specific bounds above. Extremely large composite outputs are rejected.
Alternative or Complementary methods
For a related task, use Zeugma One Verb Two Objects Yoking Detector: Zeugma links one governing expression to multiple objects or applications. This checker reviews supplied verb, object, and semantic annotations, so its candidate result depends on evidence already established by the user. For a complementary step, use Anacoluthon Syntax Break Interruption Flag: Anacoluthon involves a break in an established syntactic expectation. This checker needs annotations of the initial expectation and the observed discontinuity rather than automatic syntax recognition.
References
Similar or alternative tools
- Zeugma One Verb Two Objects Yoking Detector
Zeugma links one governing expression to multiple objects or applications. This checker reviews supplied verb, object, and semantic annotations, so its candidate result depends on evidence already established by the user.
- Anacoluthon Syntax Break Interruption Flag
Anacoluthon involves a break in an established syntactic expectation. This checker needs annotations of the initial expectation and the observed discontinuity rather than automatic syntax recognition.