Skip to content

Main content

Possible World One Relation Reflexivity Tool

Calculate possible world one relation reflexivity from explicit caller-supplied inputs.

Loading tool…

Description

Return missingLoops for worlds lacking a self-edge and reflexive when no loop is missing.

A logical calculation operates on a stated representation: truth values, token lists, counts, or an explicitly supplied relation. Checking one assignment, pair, trace, or witness is different from proving a formula or validating an entire argument. Empty domains, duplicate tokens, and scope conventions can change the result.

Return missingLoops for worlds lacking a self-edge and reflexive when no loop is missing.

When to use this tool

Use Possible World One Relation Reflexivity when you need this exact local truth, count, token, relation, or witness check within a larger logic workflow.

How to use the tool and how it works

  1. Enter worlds, edgeSources, edgeTargets. Keep parallel arrays aligned. Use the units and conventions below.
  2. Run the tool. Correct any format, range, or cross-field input error before interpreting the output.
  3. Read missingLoops, reflexive. Inspect reflexive before interpreting the associated values.

Require distinct worlds and equally sized edgeSources and edgeTargets whose tokens belong to worlds. Return missingLoops for worlds lacking a self-edge and reflexive when no loop is missing.1

Input fieldMeaning and unitsAccepted input
worldsWorldsRequired. Array of text; maximum UTF-16 length 8192; maximum items 256.
edgeSourcesEdge SourcesRequired. Array of text; maximum UTF-16 length 8192; maximum items 256.
edgeTargetsEdge TargetsRequired. Array of text; maximum UTF-16 length 8192; maximum items 256.
Output fieldInterpretationReturned shape
missingLoopsMissing LoopsRequired. Array of text; maximum UTF-16 length 8192; maximum items 256.
reflexiveReflexiveRequired. Boolean.
json
{
  "input": {
    "worlds": [
      "a",
      "b"
    ],
    "edgeSources": [
      "a",
      "b"
    ],
    "edgeTargets": [
      "a",
      "b"
    ]
  },
  "output": {
    "missingLoops": [],
    "reflexive": true
  }
}

Limitations and assumptions

  • Duplicate edges are allowed. An empty domain is reflexive by vacuity; the tool checks only relation reflexivity, not modal frame validity or other accessibility properties.
  • Inputs must satisfy both the field types and the cross-field conditions above. Invalid input causes an error; a successful false flag or documented placeholder is a different result.

Alternative or Complementary methods

Use a parser, scope-aware representation, model checker, or proof procedure when the supplied token or witness representation is insufficient. A local passing check should not be promoted to global validity.

References

  1. Calculation and input contract: philosophy/possible-world-one-relation-reflexivity — tool.io

Similar or alternative tools