Capitalization Randomness Index
Measure how liberally a manuscript sample capitalizes word initials: the exact fraction of whitespace tokens beginning with an uppercase letter (a rate near one reflects the medieval habit of decorating most words) plus the number of distinct capitalized initial letters.
Description
Measure how liberally a manuscript sample capitalizes word initials: the exact fraction of whitespace tokens beginning with an uppercase letter (a rate near one reflects the medieval habit of decorating most words) plus the number of distinct capitalized initial letters.
Capitalization Randomness Index: Measure how liberally a manuscript sample capitalizes word initials: the exact fraction of whitespace tokens beginning with an uppercase letter (a rate near one reflects the medieval habit of decorating most words) plus the number of distinct capitalized initial letters.
When to use Capitalization Randomness Index
Use this palaeographic utility to apply a stated dating, script, abbreviation, codicological, metrological, layout, or condition rule consistently while preparing manuscripts for scholarly review.
- Text sample
- Transcription sample to scan.
How Capitalization Randomness Index works
Measure how liberally a manuscript sample capitalizes word initials: the exact fraction of whitespace tokens beginning with an uppercase letter (a rate near one reflects the medieval habit of decorating most words) plus the number of distinct capitalized initial letters. The tool evaluates the supplied inputs together and returns the named outputs below; it does not infer omitted operating conditions or change the units shown.1
- Cap rate
- Uppercase-initial tokens divided by all tokens.
- Distinct initials
- Distinct uppercase initial letters observed.
- Tokens
- Whitespace-delimited tokens containing at least one letter.
Limitations and assumptions
- Script and manuscript evidence varies by language, region, institution, period, scribe, material, restoration, and cataloguing convention. A heuristic flag or score is not an authoritative date, hand attribution, reading, provenance, or conservation diagnosis.
- Use finite inputs in the displayed units and preserve more precision than the final presentation requires. Independently verify safety-critical, financial, compliance, or production decisions.
Alternative or Complementary approaches
Retain page images, scale, foliation, material, provenance, diplomatic transcription, uncertainty, and comparison exemplars; confirm conclusions with codicological context and specialist judgment.
References
-
Palaeography — Wikipedia contributors
Similar or alternative tools
- Tironian Et Frequency Counter
Count the Tironian et sign (U+204A), the ampersand and standalone 'et' tokens in a transcription sample and report the Tironian et rate per thousand whitespace tokens as exact arithmetic.
- Ductus Complexity Index Rater
Rate script ductus complexity under the stated rule: strokes per letter with bands economical (<3), moderate (3-6) and complex (>6), plus pen lifts per letter as a secondary index.
- Contraction Loss Detector
Measure how many scribal contraction abbreviations survive from exemplar to copy: exact percent change with the stated rating bands (no change at zero, minor under five percent dropped, moderate five to fifteen, major above fifteen, any increase is expansion).