Description
Flag a reported cointervention excluded under a supplied protocol assertion.
Research and visit records distinguish quoted claims, observation codes, comparator descriptions, raters and recorded cointerventions. A metadata link or protocol-review flag is not evidence of efficacy or a validated clinical finding. Time labels and coordinate offsets preserve supplied conventions without assessing a person or recommending an intervention.
Flag a reported cointervention excluded under a supplied protocol assertion.
When to use this tool
Use Osteopathic Study Cointervention Flag when you already have studyId, cointerventionReported, excludedByProtocol and need to flag a reported cointervention excluded under a supplied protocol assertion.
How to use the tool and how it works
- Enter studyId, cointerventionReported, excludedByProtocol. Use the units and conventions below.
- Run the tool. Correct any format, range, or cross-field input error before interpreting the output.
- Read requiresProtocolReview. Inspect requiresProtocolReview before interpreting the associated values.
Require studyId nonempty; requiresProtocolReview=cointerventionReported && excludedByProtocol.1
| Input field | Meaning and units | Accepted input |
|---|---|---|
| studyId | Study Id | Required. Text; minimum UTF-16 length 1; maximum UTF-16 length 8192. |
| cointerventionReported | Cointervention Reported | Required. Boolean. |
| excludedByProtocol | Excluded By Protocol | Required. Boolean. |
| Output field | Interpretation | Returned shape |
|---|---|---|
| requiresProtocolReview | Requires Protocol Review | Required. Boolean. |
{
"input": {
"studyId": "ST17",
"cointerventionReported": true,
"excludedByProtocol": true
},
"output": {
"requiresProtocolReview": true
}
}Limitations and assumptions
- The protocol assertion is supplied; no treatment effectiveness, actual deviation or appropriate participant care is determined.
- Inputs must satisfy both the field types and the cross-field conditions above. Invalid input causes an error; a successful false flag or documented placeholder is a different result.
Alternative or Complementary methods
Review original research protocols, comparator definitions and recorded observations for study interpretation. Assess reported findings and efficacy through the relevant evidence rather than treating a preserved claim, rater order or visit-duration label as validation.
References
Similar or alternative tools
- Osteopathy Comparator Description Key
Qualify an explicit comparator description by study and source.
- Osteopathic Research Blinding Response
Record an explicit participant blinding response.