Andrica Conjecture Checker
Check finite Andrica √p_next−√p<1 using stable gap/(√p_next+√p); actual prime sieve, no inference about all future pairs.
Description
Andrica's inequality concerns square-root gaps between consecutive primes.
Andrica's inequality concerns square-root gaps between consecutive primes. A rationalized expression avoids subtracting nearby square roots.1
Check finite Andrica √p_next−√p<1 using stable gap/(√p_next+√p); actual prime sieve, no inference about all future pairs.
When to use Andrica Conjecture Checker
Use this tool to check finite Andrica √p_next−√p<1 using stable gap/(√p_next+√p); actual prime sieve, no inference about all future pairs.
Choose the integer, sequence, coefficients or function parameters for your calculation. Follow the stated ordering, domain and size limits.
How to use Andrica Conjecture Checker and understand its results
- Choose the integer, sequence, coefficients or function parameters for your calculation. Follow the stated ordering, domain and size limits.
- Enter primeCutoff using the field table and calculation rules, then run the tool.
- Read observedSquareRootPrimeGaps, andricaViolationLeftPrimes, allObservedPairsSatisfyInequality. The explanation below defines the units, signs, ordering and any flags or placeholder values.
- If the tool reports an input issue, correct the values and run it again. Apply the stated assumptions when interpreting a successfully returned result.
| Input field | Meaning | Value type; see rules below | Requirement |
|---|---|---|---|
| primeCutoff | Prime cutoff | number | Required |
Use integer sieve cutoff 0–one million. Compute every observed adjacent square-root gap and collect left primes where the value is at least 1. Return a satisfaction flag; an empty observed inventory satisfies it vacuously.
sqrt(next prime)−sqrt(prime)=gap/[sqrt(next prime)+sqrt(prime)] Units, indexing, boundary conditions and exceptional cases are defined in the calculation rules above.
| Output field | Meaning | Value type |
|---|---|---|
| observedSquareRootPrimeGaps | Observed square root prime gaps | list of number |
| andricaViolationLeftPrimes | Andrica violation left primes | list of number |
| allObservedPairsSatisfyInequality | All observed pairs satisfy inequality | boolean |
{
"input": {
"primeCutoff": 7
},
"output": {
"observedSquareRootPrimeGaps": [
0.3178372451957822,
0.5040171699309124,
0.40968333356480086
],
"andricaViolationLeftPrimes": [],
"allObservedPairsSatisfyInequality": true
}
} Limitations and assumptions
Finite satisfaction gives no conclusion about all larger primes.
Numeric inputs and returned numeric values must be finite; an unrepresentable returned value produces an error. Missing required fields, extra fields, wrong value types and violations of the calculation rules are input errors. A successfully returned false flag is an evaluated outcome; its meaning is explained above.
Alternative or Complementary methods
Use Firoozbakht Conjecture Checker: Exactly check finite Firoozbakht p_(n+1)^n < p_n^(n+1) using BigInt and true prime indices from complete sieve; observed satisfaction is not global conjecture proof. For a complementary task, use Cramér Conjecture Checker: Screen finite adjacent-prime gap/log²(p) ratios under explicit caller coefficient; Cramér conjecture is asymptotic big-O, not a universal coefficient-one theorem proved/disproved by small primes.
References
-
Andrica Conjecture Checker — tool.io
Similar or alternative tools
- Firoozbakht Conjecture Checker
Exactly check finite Firoozbakht p_(n+1)^n < p_n^(n+1) using BigInt and true prime indices from complete sieve; observed satisfaction is not global conjecture proof.
- Cramér Conjecture Checker
Screen finite adjacent-prime gap/log²(p) ratios under explicit caller coefficient; Cramér conjecture is asymptotic big-O, not a universal coefficient-one theorem proved/disproved by small primes.