Embargo Coordination
Audit embargo coordination confirmations across required recipients.
Description
Embargo coordination can track whether required participant labels are present in a supplied acknowledgment list.
Embargo coordination can track whether required participant labels are present in a supplied acknowledgment list. Coverage helps locate missing records.1
Audit embargo coordination confirmations across required recipients.
When to use Embargo Coordination
Use this tool to audit embargo coordination confirmations across required recipients.
Prepare the text, recorded observations, aligned figures or editorial criteria requested. Confirm what each label, count, timestamp or supplied flag represents before interpreting the result.
How to use Embargo Coordination and understand its results
- Prepare the text, recorded observations, aligned figures or editorial criteria requested. Confirm what each label, count, timestamp or supplied flag represents before interpreting the result.
- Enter requiredRecipients, confirmedRecipients using the field table and calculation rules, then run the tool.
- Read coveragePercent, matched, missing, unexpected. The explanation below defines the units, signs, ordering and any flags or placeholder values.
- If the tool reports an input issue, correct the values and run it again. Apply the stated assumptions when interpreting a successfully returned result.
| Input field | Meaning | Value type; see rules below | Requirement |
|---|---|---|---|
| requiredRecipients | Required embargo recipients | list of string | Required |
| confirmedRecipients | Confirmed recipients | list of string | Required |
Supply required and observed coordination labels. Enter a nonempty required list and an observed list, which may be empty. Trim and lowercase entries for comparison; blank entries are errors. Deduplicate by normalized key. Return matched/missing required labels, unexpected observed labels, and coverage. Required order is preserved; the last trimmed spelling wins for duplicate keys.
coverage%=100×matchedUnique/requiredUnique Units, indexing, boundary conditions and exceptional cases are defined in the calculation rules above.
| Output field | Meaning | Value type |
|---|---|---|
| coveragePercent | Coverage (%) | number; minimum: 0; maximum: 100 |
| matched | Matched items | list of string |
| missing | Missing items | list of string |
| unexpected | Unexpected items | list of string |
{
"input": {
"requiredRecipients": [
"alpha",
"beta",
"gamma"
],
"confirmedRecipients": [
"beta",
"alpha",
"extra"
]
},
"output": {
"coveragePercent": 66.66666666666666,
"matched": [
"alpha",
"beta"
],
"missing": [
"gamma"
],
"unexpected": [
"extra"
]
}
} Limitations and assumptions
No email is sent and no embargo terms, actual acknowledgment or compliance is verified.
Numeric inputs must be finite. Follow the calculation-specific rules for overflow, underflow and exceptional cases. Lists are limited to 100,000 entries; the rules above may require smaller limits. Missing required fields, extra fields, wrong value types and violations of the calculation rules are input errors.
Alternative or Complementary methods
Use Records Request SLA: Measure a records-request response against a caller-supplied SLA. For a complementary task, use Media Policy Coverage: Audit newsroom media-policy coverage.
References
-
Embargo Coordination — tool.io
Similar or alternative tools
- Records Request SLA
Measure a records-request response against a caller-supplied SLA.
- Media Policy Coverage
Audit newsroom media-policy coverage.