Email Auth Coverage
Audit email authentication method coverage.
Description
Email authentication coverage tracks named checks such as those selected by a mail administrator.
Email authentication coverage tracks named checks such as those selected by a mail administrator. A recorded label does not prove a passing authentication result.1
Audit email authentication method coverage.
When to use Email Auth Coverage
Use this tool to audit email authentication method coverage.
Prepare the text, recorded observations, aligned figures or editorial criteria requested. Confirm what each label, count, timestamp or supplied flag represents before interpreting the result.
How to use Email Auth Coverage and understand its results
- Prepare the text, recorded observations, aligned figures or editorial criteria requested. Confirm what each label, count, timestamp or supplied flag represents before interpreting the result.
- Enter requiredMethods, configuredMethods using the field table and calculation rules, then run the tool.
- Read coveragePercent, matched, missing, unexpected. The explanation below defines the units, signs, ordering and any flags or placeholder values.
- If the tool reports an input issue, correct the values and run it again. Apply the stated assumptions when interpreting a successfully returned result.
| Input field | Meaning | Value type; see rules below | Requirement |
|---|---|---|---|
| requiredMethods | Required email authentication methods | list of string | Required |
| configuredMethods | Configured methods | list of string | Required |
Supply required and observed authentication labels. Enter a nonempty required list and an observed list, which may be empty. Trim and lowercase entries for comparison; blank entries are errors. Deduplicate by normalized key. Return matched/missing required labels, unexpected observed labels, and coverage. Required order is preserved; the last trimmed spelling wins for duplicate keys.
coverage%=100×matchedUnique/requiredUnique Units, indexing, boundary conditions and exceptional cases are defined in the calculation rules above.
| Output field | Meaning | Value type |
|---|---|---|
| coveragePercent | Coverage (%) | number; minimum: 0; maximum: 100 |
| matched | Matched items | list of string |
| missing | Missing items | list of string |
| unexpected | Unexpected items | list of string |
{
"input": {
"requiredMethods": [
"alpha",
"beta",
"gamma"
],
"configuredMethods": [
"beta",
"alpha",
"extra"
]
},
"output": {
"coveragePercent": 66.66666666666666,
"matched": [
"alpha",
"beta"
],
"missing": [
"gamma"
],
"unexpected": [
"extra"
]
}
} Limitations and assumptions
No message headers, DNS, signatures or live mail configuration are inspected.
Numeric inputs must be finite. Follow the calculation-specific rules for overflow, underflow and exceptional cases. Lists are limited to 100,000 entries; the rules above may require smaller limits. Missing required fields, extra fields, wrong value types and violations of the calculation rules are input errors.
Alternative or Complementary methods
Use Digital Security Checklist: Compare caller-supplied requirements and observations for digital security checklist. For a complementary task, use Onboarding Access Checklist: Compare caller-supplied requirements and observations for onboarding access checklist.
References
-
Email Auth Coverage — tool.io
Similar or alternative tools
- Digital Security Checklist
Compare caller-supplied requirements and observations for digital security checklist.
- Onboarding Access Checklist
Compare caller-supplied requirements and observations for onboarding access checklist.