Red Team Devils Advocate Assumption Attack Protocol
Cross caller-supplied assumptions with red-team attack modes to generate falsifiable challenge prompts.
Description
An assumption attack protocol prompts reviewers to challenge a scenario in several ways.
An assumption attack protocol prompts reviewers to challenge a scenario in several ways. Pair generation does not itself falsify an assumption.1
The returned values include Assumptions, Attack prompts, Attack prompts. The How section below explains the calculation, input rules and interpretation.
When to use Red Team Devils Advocate Assumption Attack Protocol
Use Red Team Devils Advocate Assumption Attack Protocol when you need to evaluate the supplied records under the calculation and evidence rules below. No evidence is collected and no actual red-team judgment is made.
Define the question, evidence and scenario assumptions first. Supply the chosen score scales, time horizons or reference selection explicitly. Interpret generated text as a discussion template and screen labels as the stated rules.
How to use Red Team Devils Advocate Assumption Attack Protocol and understand its results
- Define the question, evidence and scenario assumptions first. Supply the chosen score scales, time horizons or reference selection explicitly. Interpret generated text as a discussion template and screen labels as the stated rules.
- Enter assumptions, attackModes using the field table and calculation rules, then run the tool.
- Read assumptionCount, attackCount, attackPrompts. The explanation below defines the units, signs, ordering and any flags or placeholder values.
- If the tool reports an input issue, correct the values and run it again. Apply the stated assumptions when interpreting a successfully returned result.
| Input field | Meaning | Value type; see rules below | Requirement |
|---|---|---|---|
| assumptions | Assumptions | list of string | Required |
| attackModes | Labels from invert, stress, remove, delegate, preempt, and reframe. | list of string | Required |
Trim nonblank nonempty assumptions. Normalize nonempty attack modes to invert/stress/remove/delegate/preempt/reframe. Generate every pair assumption-major then mode order; duplicates remain. Return counts and fixed challenge prompts.
prompts=assumptions×attackModes Units, indexing, boundary conditions and exceptional cases are defined in the calculation rules above.
| Output field | Meaning | Value type |
|---|---|---|
| assumptionCount | Assumptions | integer; minimum: 1 |
| attackCount | Attack prompts | integer; minimum: 1 |
| attackPrompts | Attack prompts | list of string |
{
"input": {
"assumptions": [
"Customers will adopt",
"Costs will fall"
],
"attackModes": [
"invert",
"stress"
]
},
"output": {
"assumptionCount": 2,
"attackCount": 4,
"attackPrompts": [
"invert: challenge 'Customers will adopt' and record the evidence that would disprove it.",
"stress: challenge 'Customers will adopt' and record the evidence that would disprove it.",
"invert: challenge 'Costs will fall' and record the evidence that would disprove it.",
"stress: challenge 'Costs will fall' and record the evidence that would disprove it."
]
}
} Limitations and assumptions
No evidence is collected and no actual red-team judgment is made.
Numeric inputs, where present, must be finite. Follow the calculation-specific rules for overflow, underflow and exceptional cases. Core numeric and string lists are limited to 100,000 entries; text entries are subject to the general large-text limit. Follow any smaller calculation limits above. Missing fields without a declared default, extra fields, wrong value types and violations of the calculation rules are input errors.
Alternative or Complementary methods
Use Assumption Reversal Question Generator: Reversing an assumption can prompt alternative strategies and evidence tests. The template creates questions rather than a logically derived negation. For a complementary task, use Wind Tunnelling Policy Test Scenarios Method: Policy wind tunnelling tests mechanisms under several stressors. A generated question is a test plan rather than a result.
References
Similar or alternative tools
- Assumption Reversal Question Generator
Reversing an assumption can prompt alternative strategies and evidence tests. The template creates questions rather than a logically derived negation.
- Wind Tunnelling Policy Test Scenarios Method
Policy wind tunnelling tests mechanisms under several stressors. A generated question is a test plan rather than a result.