Skip to content

Main content

Counterexample Witness Proposition Link Tool

Link an explicitly supplied proposition and witness relation without checking whether a counterexample is valid.

Loading tool…

Description

Link a supplied counterexample witness to a proposition.

Evidence records distinguish claims, source origins, confidence labels, logical scope and access status. Repeated citations may share an origin rather than provide independent support; an unknown origin is not proof of independence. A recorded support or witness link does not establish entailment, truth or a valid inference.

Link a supplied counterexample witness to a proposition.

When to use this tool

Use Counterexample Witness Proposition Link when checking the stated evidence, source, confidence or logical-label convention.

How to use the tool and how it works

  1. Enter propositionId, witnessId, suppliedRelation. Use the units and conventions below.
  2. Run the tool. Correct any format, range, or cross-field input error before interpreting the output.
  3. Read token. Use the output convention below.

Require nonempty proposition ID, witness ID and supplied relation. Encode the ordered triple as JSON text.1

Input fieldMeaning and unitsAccepted input
propositionIdProposition IdRequired. Text; minimum UTF-16 length 1; maximum UTF-16 length 8192.
witnessIdWitness IdRequired. Text; minimum UTF-16 length 1; maximum UTF-16 length 8192.
suppliedRelationSupplied RelationRequired. Text; minimum UTF-16 length 1; maximum UTF-16 length 8192.
Output fieldInterpretationReturned shape
tokenJSON-encoded ordered tuple or literal token under the convention above; not a database lookup or authentication result.Required. Text; maximum UTF-16 length 8192.
json
{
  "input": {
    "propositionId": "P17",
    "witnessId": "W4",
    "suppliedRelation": "counterexample"
  },
  "output": {
    "token": "[\"P17\",\"W4\",\"counterexample\"]"
  }
}

Limitations and assumptions

  • The witness is not evaluated and may not be a counterexample; no logical, mathematical or evidential conclusion is established.
  • Inputs must satisfy both the field types and the cross-field conditions above. Invalid input causes an error; a successful false flag or documented placeholder is a different result.

Alternative or Complementary methods

Inspect original evidence and use appropriate complete logical/statistical analysis, preserving uncertainty, provenance and applicable access/reuse permissions.

References

  1. Calculation and input contract: epistemology/counterexample-witness-proposition-link — tool.io

Similar or alternative tools