Skip to content

Main content

Startup Experiment Evidence Status

Label explicit experiment observation and review flags without judging scientific evidence or product viability.

Loading tool…

Description

Label an experiment's supplied observation and evidence-review status.

Venture calculations depend on funding scope, fee bases, repayment terms, equity conventions and reporting periods. A post-money investor fraction differs from a pre-money valuation ratio, while constant-burn runway is conditional on a positive burn assumption. Interview consent and reported hypothesis support remain source-record assertions rather than verified evidence.

Label an experiment's supplied observation and evidence-review status.

When to use this tool

Use Startup Experiment Evidence Status when you already have experimentId, observed, reviewed, supportsHypothesis and need to label an experiment's supplied observation and evidence-review status.

How to use the tool and how it works

  1. Enter experimentId, observed, reviewed, supportsHypothesis. Use the units and conventions below.
  2. Run the tool. Correct any format, range, or cross-field input error before interpreting the output.
  3. Read label. Use the output convention below.

Require experimentId nonempty, reviewed implies observed, and supportsHypothesis implies reviewed. Choose not observed, awaiting review, reported support or no reported support in that order.1

Input fieldMeaning and unitsAccepted input
experimentIdExperiment IdRequired. Text; minimum UTF-16 length 1; maximum UTF-16 length 8192.
observedObservedRequired. Boolean.
reviewedReviewedRequired. Boolean.
supportsHypothesisSupports HypothesisRequired. Boolean.
Output fieldInterpretationReturned shape
labelLabelRequired. Text; maximum UTF-16 length 8192.
json
{
  "input": {
    "experimentId": "EXP17",
    "observed": true,
    "reviewed": true,
    "supportsHypothesis": false
  },
  "output": {
    "label": "EXP17 [no reported support]"
  }
}

Limitations and assumptions

  • The flags must be internally consistent but are not evidence evaluation. Reported support does not establish validity, causality or a successful venture.
  • Inputs must satisfy both the field types and the cross-field conditions above. Invalid input causes an error; a successful false flag or documented placeholder is a different result.

Alternative or Complementary methods

Reconcile the actual cash-flow forecast, financing agreement, cap table and experiment records for a venture decision. Use the full vesting and funding terms and inspect evidence quality; one balance, status label or supplied fraction does not establish feasibility, ownership or customer demand.

References

  1. Calculation and input contract: entrepreneurship-studies/startup-experiment-evidence-status — tool.io

Similar or alternative tools