DNS MX Preference Tie Groups

Group explicit DNS MX records by ascending unsigned preference, retaining equal-preference alternatives and indexes; no resolver ordering, target validation or mail delivery claim.

Description

Group explicit DNS MX records by ascending unsigned preference, retaining equal-preference alternatives and indexes; no resolver ordering, target validation or mail delivery claim.

MX preference ties identify equally preferred mail-exchanger observations. Keeping their indexes preserves the input evidence without choosing a destination.

When to use this tool

Group explicit DNS MX records by ascending unsigned preference, retaining equal-preference alternatives and indexes; no resolver ordering, target validation or mail delivery claim.

  • Prepare the supplied recordsJson fields for this operation.
  • Compare the complete example with the representation used by your own input before carrying the result into another step.

How to use the tool and how it works

  1. Enter recordsJson. Use the exact text syntax, units and index conventions explained below.
  2. Run the tool. If input validation fails, correct the supplied fields before interpreting any result.
  3. Read result.groups. Interpret false, null and empty lists using the distinctions below; they can be valid outputs.

Parse recordsJson as preference/exchange objects, with integer preference from 0 to 65,535. Group by preference, sort groups ascending and retain source indexes and exchange strings in input order.1

Input fieldMeaning and representationAccepted input
recordsJsonJSON text, entered as one text field. The decoded structure is illustrated below; it is not a separate file.Text

For the JSON text fields, the following decoded structures show the example records before they are serialized into input strings. Keep field names, list nesting and value types as shown.

json
[
  {
    "field": "recordsJson",
    "decoded": [
      {
        "preference": 20,
        "exchange": "b"
      },
      {
        "preference": 10,
        "exchange": "a"
      },
      {
        "preference": 10,
        "exchange": "c"
      }
    ]
  }
]
Output fieldInterpretation
resultObject containing the named outputs below.
result.groupsThe groups list in the ordering and representation described above.
json
{
  "input": {
    "recordsJson": "[{\"preference\":20,\"exchange\":\"b\"},{\"preference\":10,\"exchange\":\"a\"},{\"preference\":10,\"exchange\":\"c\"}]"
  },
  "output": {
    "result": {
      "groups": [
        {
          "preference": 10,
          "indexes": [
            1,
            2
          ],
          "exchanges": [
            "a",
            "c"
          ]
        },
        {
          "preference": 20,
          "indexes": [
            0
          ],
          "exchanges": [
            "b"
          ]
        }
      ]
    }
  }
}

Limitations and assumptions

  • No DNS query, address resolution or mail delivery occurs. Equal-preference records are not randomized or resolved into a final connection order.
  • All declared input fields are required and unexpected top-level fields are rejected. Numbers must be finite; lists are limited to 128 entries and ordinary text fields to 8,192 UTF-16 code units, with tighter limits where stated.
  • JSON text inputs must parse within bounded nesting and size limits. Numeric outputs outside the safe finite range are rejected; large exact integer results use decimal strings. Indexes and half-open spans are zero-based unless a rank is explicitly described as one-based.

Alternative or Complementary methods

Use a packet-aware DNS parser or resolver when the task requires compression-chain validation, live records or complete resource-record semantics. Keep byte labels, presentation text and network packets distinct.

References

  1. Tool behavior and example: DNS MX Preference Tie Groups — tool.io

Similar or alternative tools

Don't forget to set a bookmark for tool.io!
Privacy | Imprint | Cookies