Skip to content

Main content

Text Fragment Counter Reading Link

Link a supplied text fragment to an explicit reading identifier and relation code without evaluating interpretation.

Loading tool…

Description

Link a supplied text fragment to an explicit reading identifier and relation code.

Critical annotations distinguish source voices, editorial insertions, omission markers, edition locators and caller-assigned interpretations. Case preservation and half-open text offsets describe representation rather than meaning. A bracketed token or source-role label does not verify faithful quotation, authority, an argument or its historical context.

Link a supplied text fragment to an explicit reading identifier and relation code.

When to use this tool

Use Text Fragment Counter Reading Link when you already have fragmentId, readingId, relationCode and need to link a supplied text fragment to an explicit reading identifier and relation code.

How to use the tool and how it works

  1. Enter fragmentId, readingId, relationCode. Use the units and conventions below.
  2. Run the tool. Correct any format, range, or cross-field input error before interpreting the output.
  3. Read token. Use the output convention below.

Enter fragmentId, readingId, relationCode using the field constraints below. Encode these values, in exactly that order, as a JSON array and return the serialized array as text in token. String values are preserved without trimming or external terminology lookup.1

Input fieldMeaning and unitsAccepted input
fragmentIdFragment IdRequired. Text; minimum UTF-16 length 1; maximum UTF-16 length 8192.
readingIdReading IdRequired. Text; minimum UTF-16 length 1; maximum UTF-16 length 8192.
relationCodeRelation CodeRequired. Text; minimum UTF-16 length 1; maximum UTF-16 length 8192.
Output fieldInterpretationReturned shape
tokenTokenRequired. Text; maximum UTF-16 length 8192.
json
{
  "input": {
    "fragmentId": "F17",
    "readingId": "R4",
    "relationCode": "counter-reading"
  },
  "output": {
    "token": "[\"F17\",\"R4\",\"counter-reading\"]"
  }
}

Limitations and assumptions

  • The result records supplied values without evaluating interpretation. Sources and asserted relationships are not independently authenticated.
  • Inputs must satisfy both the field types and the cross-field conditions above. Invalid input causes an error; a successful false flag or documented placeholder is a different result.

Alternative or Complementary methods

Read the original passage and relevant edition with the stated interpretive and editorial conventions. Verify source context and attribution before reuse; local span labels and interpretation-objection pair keys organize records without evaluating the argument or granting quotation rights.

References

  1. Calculation and input contract: critical-theory/text-fragment-counter-reading-link — tool.io

Similar or alternative tools