Description
Compare incoming versus outgoing off-diagonal error weight for each label, retaining signed class error-flow imbalance.
A confusion table uses actual labels as rows and predicted labels as columns. Cells can contain occurrence counts or supplied nonnegative weights; the axis label order must stay with the matrix. Row, column and joint normalization have different denominators, and a zero denominator needs an explicit undefined result.
Compare incoming versus outgoing off-diagonal error weight for each label, retaining signed class error-flow imbalance.
When to use this tool
Use this tool to compare incoming versus outgoing off-diagonal error weight for each label, retaining signed class error-flow imbalance.
How to use the tool and how it works
- Enter matrix, labels using the input definitions below.
- Run the operation. Resolve malformed-input errors before interpreting the result.
- Read result.classes. Interpret signs, units, ordering and null values using the rules below.
For each label, outgoing is its off-diagonal row sum and incoming its off-diagonal column sum. Return imbalance = incoming−outgoing with both component totals.1
| Input field | Meaning and units | Accepted input |
|---|---|---|
| matrix | Square nonnegative finite table: matrix[actualIndex][predictedIndex], both axes in labels order. | Dense list of at most 128 rows of at most 128 finite numbers; the operation’s shape constraints also apply. |
| labels | Distinct label strings defining actual row and predicted column order; score tools require at least one label. | Dense list of at most 128 strings, each at most 8,192 UTF-16 code units. |
| Output field | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| result | Object containing the fields below. |
| result.classes | Input-label-order {label,incoming,outgoing,imbalance} records, where imbalance is incoming minus outgoing. |
{
"input": {
"matrix": [
[
2,
1
],
[
0,
1
]
],
"labels": [
"a",
"b"
]
},
"output": {
"result": {
"classes": [
{
"label": "a",
"incoming": 0,
"outgoing": 1,
"imbalance": -1
},
{
"label": "b",
"incoming": 1,
"outgoing": 0,
"imbalance": 1
}
]
}
}
} Limitations and assumptions
- Signed error flow uses supplied support units and does not quantify error severity or causal bias.
- Label strings are compared exactly. Confusion values may be nonnegative fractional weights; a count interpretation requires count data. Probability-like score rows use [0,1] entries with sum tolerance 10⁻⁸, without establishing calibration.
- Every declared top-level input is required and unknown fields are rejected. Ordinary strings are limited to 8,192 UTF-16 code units and lists to 128 entries, with tighter operation-specific bounds where stated. JSON text has bounded nesting and node counts.
- Numeric outputs must be finite and within the absolute safe-integer magnitude; exact larger integers use decimal text. Source positions are zero-based UTF-16 offsets and span ends are exclusive unless a different convention is explicitly stated.
Alternative or Complementary methods
Check label coverage and axis order before comparing tables. Use a separate evaluation design for uncertainty, calibration, operating thresholds and the consequences of real-world decisions.
References
Similar or alternative tools
- Confusion Actual Support Table
Report actual row support totals without calculating per-class rates.
- Confusion Column Rate Table
Normalize each predicted column independently with null for zero-support columns; no calibrated probability claim.