Letter of Credit UCP600 Document Examiner Checklist Lookup
Restricted documentary-credit examination evidence under independently established UCP600credit terms; not document authentication or guaranteed payment. Independently witnessed columns in order: applicable credit/UCP edition identified, presentation timing independently checked, required documents enumerated, facial consistency independently reviewed, discrepancies recorded. Missing and unknown remain distinct; this is not legal compliance, coverage, authenticity or safety certification.
Description
Document examination under a letter of credit depends on the credit terms and incorporated rules.
Document examination under a letter of credit depends on the credit terms and incorporated rules.1
A checklist records independently reviewed presentation criteria without reading documents or guaranteeing payment. Use Letter of Credit UCP600 Document Examiner Checklist Lookup to evaluate the supplied inputs under the model explained below.
When to use Letter of Credit UCP600 Document Examiner Checklist Lookup
Use Letter of Credit UCP600 Document Examiner Checklist Lookup to evaluate the supplied inputs under the model explained below. Establish the currency and minor-unit convention, measurement period and applicable transaction or institution context.
How to use Letter of Credit UCP600 Document Examiner Checklist Lookup and understand its results
- Establish the currency and minor-unit convention, measurement period and applicable transaction or institution context.
- Enter Observed criterion flags, Criterion known flags using the field table and validation rules below, then run the tool.
- Read Witnessed Criteria, Known Missing Criteria, Unknown Criteria in the Result object; interpret the units, signs, ordering and unknown-value placeholders described below.
- Correct reported input errors and rerun. Apply successful results according to their specific meanings and check the assumptions before using them in a decision.
| Input field | Meaning | Value type | Requirement |
|---|---|---|---|
| observedCriterionFlags | Observed criterion flags | array of number | Required; constraints below |
| criterionKnownFlags | Criterion known flags | array of number | Required; constraints below |
Enter two binary arrays of exactly five independently annotated criterion flags in the table order: observed presence and whether that observation is known. A known 1 is witnessed, a known 0 is missing, and known flag 0 is unknown regardless of the observation placeholder. Return criterion-text lists in fixed order. This records review evidence; it does not read documents, verify facts or approve compliance.
witnessed=known AND present; missing=known AND absent; unknown=NOT known Use the field order, units and branch conditions described above.
| Criterion index | Independently reviewed criterion |
|---|---|
| 0 | applicable credit/UCP edition identified |
| 1 | presentation timing independently checked |
| 2 | required documents enumerated |
| 3 | facial consistency independently reviewed |
| 4 | discrepancies recorded |
| Output field | Meaning | Value type |
|---|---|---|
| result | Object containing the named result fields below. | object |
| result.witnessedCriteria | Witnessed Criteria | array of string |
| result.knownMissingCriteria | Known Missing Criteria | array |
| result.unknownCriteria | Unknown Criteria | array |
{
"input": {
"observedCriterionFlags": [
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
],
"criterionKnownFlags": [
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
]
},
"output": {
"result": {
"witnessedCriteria": [
"applicable credit/UCP edition identified",
"presentation timing independently checked",
"required documents enumerated",
"facial consistency independently reviewed",
"discrepancies recorded"
],
"knownMissingCriteria": [],
"unknownCriteria": []
}
}
}Limitations and assumptions
A checklist records independently reviewed presentation criteria without reading documents or guaranteeing payment. Apply the exact scope and assumptions explained above.
All listed fields require explicit values. Unexpected fields, incorrect types, nonfinite numbers and sparse arrays fail validation. Domain-specific bounds, alignments and supported tokens are explained above; extremely large inputs or outputs can also be rejected. Input errors differ from successful false results, empty match lists and unknown-evidence placeholders.
Alternative or Complementary methods
Use Documentary Collection DP Versus DA Methods Lookup for a related task: Documents against payment and documents against acceptance release trade documents under different instructions.
Use MT799 Free Format Pre Advice Versus Binding Note Lookup for a related task: A free-format bank message conveys text within a messaging standard.
References
Similar or alternative tools
- Documentary Collection DP Versus DA Methods Lookup
Documents against payment and documents against acceptance release trade documents under different instructions.
- MT799 Free Format Pre Advice Versus Binding Note Lookup
A free-format bank message conveys text within a messaging standard.