Subservice Method Selector
Select a subservice-organization reporting method from supplied evidence facts.
Description
Subservice reporting approaches depend on materiality and available evidence.
Subservice reporting approaches depend on materiality and available evidence. This selector applies a fixed decision priority.1
Select a subservice-organization reporting method from supplied evidence facts.
When to use Subservice Method Selector
Use this tool to select a subservice-organization reporting method from supplied evidence facts.
Prepare the documented facts, aligned totals or expected/observed evidence labels requested. Choose applicable requirements and thresholds separately before interpreting a planning screen.
How to use Subservice Method Selector and understand its results
- Prepare the documented facts, aligned totals or expected/observed evidence labels requested. Choose applicable requirements and thresholds separately before interpreting a planning screen.
- Enter subserviceControlsMaterial, directEvidenceAvailable, separateReportAvailable, userCanMonitorSubservice using the field table and calculation rules, then run the tool.
- Read recommendedMethod, supportingFactorCount. The explanation below defines the units, signs, ordering and any flags or placeholder values.
- If the tool reports an input issue, correct the values and run it again. Apply the stated assumptions when interpreting a successfully returned result.
| Input field | Meaning | Value type; see rules below | Requirement |
|---|---|---|---|
| subserviceControlsMaterial | Subservice controls are material | boolean | Required |
| directEvidenceAvailable | Direct subservice evidence available | boolean | Required |
| separateReportAvailable | Separate subservice report available | boolean | Required |
| userCanMonitorSubservice | User entity can monitor subservice | boolean | Required |
Enter four booleans and return method plus count of the three evidence/monitoring factors.
not material→carve-out; direct evidence→inclusive; separate report→separate-report; monitoring→carve-out; else review Units, indexing, boundary conditions and exceptional cases are defined in the calculation rules above.
| Output field | Meaning | Value type |
|---|---|---|
| recommendedMethod | Recommended subservice method | string; one of "carve-out", "inclusive", "separate-report", "review" |
| supportingFactorCount | Supporting factor count | integer; minimum: 0 |
{
"input": {
"subserviceControlsMaterial": true,
"directEvidenceAvailable": false,
"separateReportAvailable": true,
"userCanMonitorSubservice": false
},
"output": {
"recommendedMethod": "separate-report",
"supportingFactorCount": 1
}
} Limitations and assumptions
No report, control evidence or applicable assurance requirements are reviewed; the recommendation is a planning heuristic.
Numeric inputs, where present, must be finite. Follow the calculation-specific rules for overflow, underflow and exceptional cases. Missing required fields, extra fields, wrong value types and violations of the calculation rules are input errors.
Alternative or Complementary methods
Use Trust-Criteria Coverage: Audit trust-services criteria coverage. For a complementary task, use CUEC Coverage: Audit complementary user-entity control coverage.
References
-
Subservice Method Selector — tool.io
Similar or alternative tools
- Trust-Criteria Coverage
Audit trust-services criteria coverage.
- CUEC Coverage
Audit complementary user-entity control coverage.