EQR Selection Risk
Score engagement quality-review selection risk.
Description
EQR selection risk can prioritize engagements using supplied factors.
EQR selection risk can prioritize engagements using supplied factors. The weights are fixed planning assumptions.1
Score engagement quality-review selection risk.
When to use EQR Selection Risk
Use this tool to score engagement quality-review selection risk.
Prepare the documented facts, aligned totals or expected/observed evidence labels requested. Choose applicable requirements and thresholds separately before interpreting a planning screen.
How to use EQR Selection Risk and understand its results
- Prepare the documented facts, aligned totals or expected/observed evidence labels requested. Choose applicable requirements and thresholds separately before interpreting a planning screen.
- Enter engagementRiskScore, publicInterestScore, complexityScore, inspectionRiskScore, selectionThreshold using the field table and calculation rules, then run the tool.
- Read weightedRiskScore, thresholdMargin, selected. The explanation below defines the units, signs, ordering and any flags or placeholder values.
- If the tool reports an input issue, correct the values and run it again. Apply the stated assumptions when interpreting a successfully returned result.
| Input field | Meaning | Value type; see rules below | Requirement |
|---|---|---|---|
| engagementRiskScore | Engagement risk score | number; minimum: 0 | Required |
| publicInterestScore | Public-interest score | number; minimum: 0 | Required |
| complexityScore | Complexity score | number; minimum: 0 | Required |
| inspectionRiskScore | Inspection risk score | number; minimum: 0 | Required |
| selectionThreshold | Selection threshold | number; minimum: 0 | Required |
Enter nonnegative scores/threshold; return score/margin/inclusive selected flag.
score=.35engagement+.25publicInterest+.25complexity+.15inspection Units, indexing, boundary conditions and exceptional cases are defined in the calculation rules above.
| Output field | Meaning | Value type |
|---|---|---|
| weightedRiskScore | Weighted selection score | number; minimum: 0 |
| thresholdMargin | Selection threshold margin | number |
| selected | Selected for engagement quality review | boolean |
{
"input": {
"engagementRiskScore": 80,
"publicInterestScore": 60,
"complexityScore": 70,
"inspectionRiskScore": 50,
"selectionThreshold": 65
},
"output": {
"weightedRiskScore": 68,
"thresholdMargin": 3,
"selected": true
}
}Limitations and assumptions
Scores are not capped. No mandated EQR selection, actual review or professional-rule compliance is determined.
Numeric inputs, where present, must be finite. Follow the calculation-specific rules for overflow, underflow and exceptional cases. Missing required fields, extra fields, wrong value types and violations of the calculation rules are input errors. A successfully returned false flag is an evaluated outcome; its meaning is explained above.
Alternative or Complementary methods
Use Inherent Risk Score: Combine inherent-risk factors into a weighted score. For a complementary task, use Peer-Review Independence: Audit peer-review independence safeguards.
References
-
EQR Selection Risk — tool.io
Similar or alternative tools
- Inherent Risk Score
Combine inherent-risk factors into a weighted score.
- Peer-Review Independence
Audit peer-review independence safeguards.