Client Acceptance Continuance Risk Screening Checklist

Screen caller-supplied client-acceptance risk ratings against a selected threshold and report the average and number of ratings at or above it.

Description

Client acceptance screening can summarize caller-assigned risk ratings against an explicit review threshold.

Client acceptance screening can summarize caller-assigned risk ratings against an explicit review threshold.1

This tool counts threshold breaches and averages the ratings without deciding whether to accept a client.

When to use Client Acceptance Continuance Risk Screening Checklist

Use this tool to count threshold breaches and averages the ratings without deciding whether to accept a client.

How to use Client Acceptance Continuance Risk Screening Checklist and how it works

  1. Establish the observations, units, reference context and assumptions described below.
  2. Enter acceptanceThreshold, riskRatings and run the tool.
  3. Read averageRating, highRiskCount, screenFailed, totalRisks using the meanings and sign conventions below.
  4. Correct any rejected inputs and rerun; independently review the result under the stated scope.
Input fieldMeaningValue typeRequirement
acceptanceThresholdFinite caller review threshold from 1 to 5 inclusive; equality counts as a breach.numberRequired; finite; minimum 1; maximum 5; branch conditions below
riskRatingsNonempty finite ratings from 1 to 5 inclusive; fractional ratings accepted.array of numberRequired; branch conditions below

Supply a nonempty array of finite risk ratings and a finite acceptance threshold, all from one through five inclusive. Fractional ratings and thresholds are accepted. Return mean rating, count of ratings>=threshold, total risk count and screenFailed=true whenever any rating meets the threshold. No rating, risk weight or actual acceptance decision is established.

mean=sum(ratings)/count; highRiskCount=count(rating>=threshold); screenFailed=(highRiskCount>0)

Use the stated ordering, units and branch conditions.

Output fieldMeaningValue type
averageRatingAverage Rating, using the scope, ordering and rule explained above.number
highRiskCountNumber of ratings at or above the supplied acceptance threshold.number
screenFailedTrue when at least one rating meets or exceeds the caller review threshold.boolean
totalRisksTotal Risks, using the scope, ordering and rule explained above.number
json
{
  "input": {
    "acceptanceThreshold": 4,
    "riskRatings": [
      5,
      4,
      2,
      1
    ]
  },
  "output": {
    "averageRating": 3,
    "highRiskCount": 2,
    "screenFailed": true,
    "totalRisks": 4
  }
}

Limitations and assumptions

The result summarizes supplied audit observations under the stated arithmetic or checklist rule. It does not inspect underlying documents, select sufficient audit evidence, make a professional assurance judgment or establish regulatory compliance. Empty or all-true input can describe only the recorded assertions.

Supply explicit values and dense aligned arrays. Unexpected fields, wrong types and nonfinite scalar values are rejected; fixed-token, alignment and other branch conditions are explained above. A successful false flag, empty match list or unknown-evidence list differs from an input error. Extremely large inputs or nonrepresentable results may fail.

Alternative or Complementary methods

Use Audit Committee Financial Expert Designation Criteria Lookup for a related operation: Experience and understanding criteria can be recorded as separate governance observations.

Use Audit Team Industry Expertise Specialist Use Checker for a related operation: An audit team's recorded industry labels can be compared with an engagement's stated expertise requirement.

References

  1. Client Acceptance Continuance Risk Screening Checklist — tool.io

Similar or alternative tools

Don't forget to set a bookmark for tool.io!
Privacy | Imprint | Cookies