Skip to content

Main content

Declared Interest Scope Overlap Tool

Inspect exact supplied interest-scope overlaps without determining a conflict or recusal duty.

Loading tool…

Description

Return declared/decision scope intersection.

Applied-ethics records capture supplied permissions, disclosures, criteria and time or cost assumptions. A checklist, Boolean condition or numerical margin can reveal a local inconsistency without determining ethical acceptability, valid consent or lawful authority. Context, evidence and the interests of affected people remain essential.

Return declared/decision scope intersection.

When to use this tool

Use Declared Interest Scope Overlap when checking the stated permission, disclosure, timing or ethical-review record convention.

How to use the tool and how it works

  1. Enter declaredScopes, decisionScopes. Follow any array-alignment requirements below. Use the units and conventions below.
  2. Run the tool. Correct any format, range, or cross-field input error before interpreting the output.
  3. Read overlappingScopes, overlapCount. Use the output convention below.

Return declared/decision scope intersection. Deduplicate declaredScopes, retain literal membership in decisionScopes and count the overlap.1

Input fieldMeaning and unitsAccepted input
declaredScopesDeclared ScopesRequired. Array of text; maximum UTF-16 length 8192; maximum items 256.
decisionScopesDecision ScopesRequired. Array of text; maximum UTF-16 length 8192; maximum items 256.
Output fieldInterpretationReturned shape
overlappingScopesOverlapping ScopesRequired. Array of text; maximum UTF-16 length 8192; maximum items 256.
overlapCountOverlap CountRequired. Safe integer.
json
{
  "input": {
    "declaredScopes": [
      "funding",
      "board",
      "board"
    ],
    "decisionScopes": [
      "board",
      "hiring"
    ]
  },
  "output": {
    "overlappingScopes": [
      "board"
    ],
    "overlapCount": 1
  }
}

Limitations and assumptions

  • Matching scope labels do not establish an actual conflict, complete disclosure or recusal obligation.
  • Inputs must satisfy both the field types and the cross-field conditions above. Invalid input causes an error; a successful false flag or documented placeholder is a different result.

Alternative or Complementary methods

Review the original evidence, participant choices and governing requirements with the responsible ethics and professional teams for substantive decisions.

References

  1. Calculation and input contract: applied-ethics/declared-interest-scope-overlap — tool.io

Similar or alternative tools