Robbing Frenzy Risk Score Checker
Independently observed flight/entrance/store-contact evidence under caller robbing-monitoring criteria; not causal robbing diagnosis. Independently declared positive requirements, overlapping/unknown classes retained. Caller independently verifies strain, site, protocol and evidence; not colony-health, treatment, transport-safety or regulatory certification.
Description
Robbing assessment combines independently observed indicators with a declared rule set.
Robbing assessment combines independently observed indicators with a declared rule set.1
Compatible observations do not create a universal frenzy probability or risk score. Use Robbing Frenzy Risk Score Checker to evaluate the supplied inputs under the model explained below.
When to use Robbing Frenzy Risk Score Checker
Use Robbing Frenzy Risk Score Checker to evaluate the supplied inputs under the model explained below. Define the candidate classes and their positive-evidence requirements, then distinguish evidence presence from whether it is known.
How to use Robbing Frenzy Risk Score Checker and understand its results
- Define the candidate classes and their positive-evidence requirements, then distinguish evidence presence from whether it is known.
- Enter Caller robbing observations class ids, Caller robbing observations requirements, Observed robbing observations evidence, Known robbing observations flags using the field table and validation rules below, then run the tool.
- Read Compatible caller classes, Fully witnessed caller classes; interpret the units, signs, ordering and unknown-value placeholders described below.
- Correct reported input errors and rerun. Apply successful results according to their specific meanings and check the assumptions before using them in a decision.
| Input field | Meaning | Value type | Requirement |
|---|---|---|---|
| callerRobbingObservationsClassIds | Caller robbing observations class ids | array of string | Required; constraints below |
| callerRobbingObservationsRequirements | Caller robbing observations requirements | array of array | Required; constraints below |
| observedRobbingObservationsEvidence | Observed robbing observations evidence | array of number | Required; constraints below |
| knownRobbingObservationsFlags | Known robbing observations flags | array of number | Required; constraints below |
Supply unique nonblank class IDs, one rectangular binary requirement row per class, and aligned binary observation and known-flag arrays. Each class must require at least one positive witness. Requirement 0 ignores an evidence column; requirement 1 needs a known positive observation for full witnessing. An unknown requirement remains compatible, while a known absent requirement excludes the class. Both returned class lists preserve caller order. No readiness rubric is installed and compatible does not mean fully witnessed or approved.
compatible = no required known absence; fully witnessed = every required witness known and positive Use the field order, units and branch conditions described above.
| Output field | Meaning | Value type |
|---|---|---|
| compatibleCallerClasses | Caller classes with no known absence of required positive evidence. | array of string |
| fullyWitnessedCallerClasses | Caller classes with all required positive evidence known and present. | array of string |
{
"input": {
"callerRobbingObservationsClassIds": [
"a",
"b"
],
"callerRobbingObservationsRequirements": [
[
1,
0
],
[
0,
1
]
],
"observedRobbingObservationsEvidence": [
1,
0
],
"knownRobbingObservationsFlags": [
1,
0
]
},
"output": {
"compatibleCallerClasses": [
"a",
"b"
],
"fullyWitnessedCallerClasses": [
"a"
]
}
} Limitations and assumptions
Compatible observations do not create a universal frenzy probability or risk score. Apply the exact scope and assumptions explained above.
All listed fields require explicit values. Unexpected fields, incorrect types, nonfinite numbers and sparse arrays fail validation. Domain-specific bounds, alignments and supported tokens are explained above; extremely large inputs or outputs can also be rejected. Input errors differ from successful false results, empty match lists and unknown-evidence placeholders.
Alternative or Complementary methods
Use EFB Scale vs AFB Differential Lookup for a related task: Foulbrood differential references describe observations under a verified protocol.
Use AFB Ropey Matchstick Test Checker for a related task: A ropey-brood observation is evidence considered in foulbrood assessment.
References
-
Robbing Frenzy Risk Score Checker — tool.io
Similar or alternative tools
- EFB Scale vs AFB Differential Lookup
Foulbrood differential references describe observations under a verified protocol.
- AFB Ropey Matchstick Test Checker
A ropey-brood observation is evidence considered in foulbrood assessment.