Going Concern Substantial Doubt Indicators Checklist

Inventory explicitly known/present going-concern indicators, unknowns preserved; no substantial-doubt assessment or audit opinion.

Description

Going Concern Substantial Doubt Indicators Checklist: return observed present indicators, unknown indicators, substantial doubt determined.

A going-concern review distinguishes evidence that is present from evidence that remains unknown. Missing information should not be treated as a negative finding.

This tool returns observed present indicators, unknown indicators, substantial doubt determined. Use the stated units and model convention when interpreting these fields.

When to use this tool

Use this tool when the supplied inputs match the specific operation described above and you need a repeatable result under its stated convention.

  • Check the supported input and output contract against an existing calculation or observation.
  • Use the complete example to confirm units, selector spelling and result interpretation.

How to use the tool and how it works

  1. Enter every field in the input table using the stated units and the exact supported selector spelling where applicable.
  2. Run the tool. Correct input errors before interpreting an output.
  3. Read the result fields below; use accompanying flags and the stated sign, boundary or model convention when interpreting a number.

Require unique indicator IDs and matched binary known and present flags. Report known-present IDs and separately report unknown IDs.1

Input fieldMeaning and unitsAccepted input
indicatorIdsIndicator ids.List of text values
knownFlagsKnown flags.List of finite numbers
presentFlagsPresent flags.List of finite numbers
Output fieldInterpretation
resultObject containing the following named result fields.
result.observedPresentIndicatorsObserved present indicators list, in the ordering described in the calculation.
result.unknownIndicatorsUnknown indicators list, in the ordering described in the calculation.
result.substantialDoubtDeterminedAlways false; the indicator lists are evidence organization rather than an accounting conclusion.
json
{
  "input": {
    "indicatorIds": [
      "liquidity",
      "losses"
    ],
    "knownFlags": [
      1,
      0
    ],
    "presentFlags": [
      1,
      0
    ]
  },
  "output": {
    "result": {
      "observedPresentIndicators": [
        "liquidity"
      ],
      "unknownIndicators": [
        "losses"
      ],
      "substantialDoubtDetermined": false
    }
  }
}

Limitations and assumptions

  • The tool organizes evidence only; substantialDoubtDetermined remains false.
  • Every declared field is required and unexpected fields are rejected. Numeric inputs must be finite; input errors are distinct from a valid false result or an explicitly qualified output.
  • Extremely large inputs and nonfinite or excessively large outputs are rejected. List positions reported by the tool use zero-based indices unless stated otherwise.

Alternative or Complementary methods

Check the underlying observations, units and conventions independently before using the result in a larger workflow. The tools listed below address nearby tasks; compare their inputs and scope before substituting one for this operation.

References

  1. Tool behavior and example: Going Concern Substantial Doubt Indicators Checklist — tool.io

Similar or alternative tools

  • month end close countdown days checklist

    Close-checklist due dates are caller offsets from period end.

  • Accrual Classifying Balance Sheet Accounts Tool

    Qualified caller-reference registry: actual account, expected realization/settlement, entity operations and applicable balance-sheet classification criteria. Requires independently applicable source/context/date evidence; not an authoritative table, omitted predictive model, diagnosis, permission, safety or compliance determination.

Don't forget to set a bookmark for tool.io!
Privacy | Imprint | Cookies