Repeating Pair Slip Compatibility Checker

Check whether two repeating events' implied slips are compatible given their areas and moments.

Description

Check whether two repeating events' implied slips are compatible given their areas and moments.

Repeating Pair Slip Compatibility Checker is a focused tool for the following task. Check whether two repeating events' implied slips are compatible given their areas and moments. It reports D_B/D_A, Compatible? from the values you provide rather than inventing measurements, coefficients, or professional judgment that are not part of the input.

When to use Repeating Pair Slip Compatibility Checker

Use this seismology calculation to reproduce a stated convention, screen observations, or compare scenarios whose units, coordinate conventions, catalog selection, and model assumptions are known.

M₀,A (N·m)
Required number in N·m. Moment of event A.
A_A (km²)
Required number in km². Patch area of A.
M₀,B (N·m)
Required number in N·m. Moment of event B.
A_B (km²)
Required number in km². Patch area of B.

The cited overview of Fault (geology) supplies background for the terminology and domain context used by this tool.1

How Repeating Pair Slip Compatibility Checker works

Check whether two repeating events' implied slips are compatible given their areas and moments. Inputs are interpreted exactly in the displayed units and the calculation returns the following fields without presentation rounding.

D_B/D_A
Returned number. Implied slip ratio.
Compatible?
Returned boolean. Whether the ratio is within ±20 percent of unity.

Limitations and assumptions

  • Earth structure, source geometry, path effects, site response, instrument response, catalog completeness, uncertainty, and the fitted range can dominate the accuracy of simplified seismic calculations.
  • M₀,A must be at least 0.
  • A_A must be at least 0.
  • M₀,B must be at least 0.
  • A_B must be at least 0.
  • Use finite inputs in the displayed units, preserve source measurements and assumptions, and independently verify consequential decisions.

Alternative or Complementary approaches

For analysis or hazard decisions, retain uncertainty and provenance and compare the result with waveform processing, calibrated regional models, and guidance from qualified seismologists or the responsible agency.

References

  1. Fault (geology) — Wikipedia contributors

Similar or alternative tools

Don't forget to set a bookmark for tool.io!
Privacy | Imprint | Cookies