Chirograph Wavy-Cut Checker
Assess a cut-apart chirograph under the stated heuristic: halves whose surviving letter counts differ by no more than the tolerance count as matching when a wavy cut is visible, mismatched otherwise, and indeterminate whenever no wavy cut is visible.
Description
Assess a cut-apart chirograph under the stated heuristic: halves whose surviving letter counts differ by no more than the tolerance count as matching when a wavy cut is visible, mismatched otherwise, and indeterminate whenever no wavy cut is visible.
Chirograph Wavy-Cut Checker: Assess a cut-apart chirograph under the stated heuristic: halves whose surviving letter counts differ by no more than the tolerance count as matching when a wavy cut is visible, mismatched otherwise, and indeterminate whenever no wavy cut is visible.
When to use Chirograph Wavy-Cut
Use this palaeographic utility to apply a stated dating, script, abbreviation, codicological, metrological, layout, or condition rule consistently while preparing manuscripts for scholarly review.
- Upper letters
- Letters of the chirograph word surviving above the cut.
- Lower letters
- Letters of the chirograph word surviving below the cut.
- Letter tolerance
- Maximum allowed difference between the two letter counts for a match.
- Wavy cut visible
- Whether the indented wavy cut line is actually visible.
How Chirograph Wavy-Cut works
Assess a cut-apart chirograph under the stated heuristic: halves whose surviving letter counts differ by no more than the tolerance count as matching when a wavy cut is visible, mismatched otherwise, and indeterminate whenever no wavy cut is visible. The tool evaluates the supplied inputs together and returns the named outputs below; it does not infer omitted operating conditions or change the units shown.1
- Letter difference
- Absolute difference between the two letter counts.
- Balance ratio
- Smaller letter count divided by the larger (1 when perfectly balanced).
- Verdict
- Stated-heuristic verdict for the two joining halves.
Limitations and assumptions
- Script and manuscript evidence varies by language, region, institution, period, scribe, material, restoration, and cataloguing convention. A heuristic flag or score is not an authoritative date, hand attribution, reading, provenance, or conservation diagnosis.
- Use finite inputs in the displayed units and preserve more precision than the final presentation requires. Independently verify safety-critical, financial, compliance, or production decisions.
Alternative or Complementary approaches
Retain page images, scale, foliation, material, provenance, diplomatic transcription, uncertainty, and comparison exemplars; confirm conclusions with codicological context and specialist judgment.
References
-
Palaeography — Wikipedia contributors
Similar or alternative tools
- Insular Family Flag Checker
Tally four documented Insular script features (insular g, insular delta-shaped d, long-descender insular s and the Tironian et) under the stated heuristic: no features means unlikely, exactly one is possible, two or more is probable Insular.
- Nib / X-height Consistency Checker
Check that repeated x-height measurements agree within tolerance under the stated rule: spread is (max-min)/mean in percent and the hand counts as consistent when spread does not exceed the tolerance (default 10%).
- Schwabacher Fraktur Note Generator
Generate a dated-note-style verdict for late Gothic textura under the stated heuristic on sampled ascender forms: more than 60 percent looped ascenders leans Fraktur, under 40 percent leans Schwabacher, and anything between is mixed.